In regards to potential difficulties that may arise in this project, and the advice Alison has already given us, I think that using this relatively modern programme in comparison against an older programme (such as Rosie and Jim) will lead to an interesting analysis and unique findings. It is possible that the features of CDS may have become more prevalent over time,
In addition to this, it could be possible to look at the features used between animation and puppetry. I feel that it may be possible that body language may be represented in different ways because of the animation/ puppetry. This is because in animation, anything is possible and both the laws of physics and biology do not need to be followed. Therefore, emotions may be over-exaggerated.
It must be acknowledged that while there isn't necessarily a narrator talking directly to the children, the narrative structure, repetition, and phonological features in programmes such as Peppa Pig may replicate those found within CDS. Therefore, by characters, such as Peppa Pig herself, repeating key words in the programme, it is possible that the children will acquire that word. This may also be aided with visual representations on screen.
references:
BBC, 2010. Available online at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8645658.stm last accessed: 03/11/2013
Slaton, J. 2013. Available online at: http://www.commonsensemedia.org/tv-reviews/peppa-pig ;ast accessed 03/11/13
Now would be a good time to add pages to your blog so you can use these when collecting data for your research project. These pages should be used for more in-depth collaborative work. Use your homepage for brief updates etc. Instructions for adding pages can be found on page 11 of the Introduction to Blogging booklet.
ReplyDeleteI'm a bit worried that you're still trying to look at too many things of different kinds. By definition, CDS is language addressed to children, whereas you seem to be drifting towards exploring language addressed by puppets or cartoon characters to each other, for children to observe. This could be fine, but if you try to compare older and more recent programmes, programmes for children of different ages, language addressed directly to children and language intended for them to observe, body language of actual people, puppets and cartoon characters etc., there's a real risk of going off in too many directions. I'm not saying this project can't work, but I am advising careful consideration of what exactly you want to find out and what data can enable you to answer your precise questions. It's a shame your group couldn't make the progress review session last week, and I look forward to the opportunity to talk to you soon.
ReplyDelete